Short Presentation Australian Marine Sciences Association 2026 Conference

From Policy to Practice: Implementation Challenges in Ship Biofouling Management Across Australia’s Biosecurity System (139452)

Bhavnah Komul Kalidin 1 , Carlo Mattone 1 2 , Nathan Waltham 1 , Maxine Newlands 3 , Marcus Sheaves 1
  1. College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
  2. NQ Dry Tropics, Townsville, QLD, Australia
  3. The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia

Ship biofouling is a major yet underregulated pathway for marine pest introduction. Australia is a globally recognised leader in marine biosecurity. Policy and management of ship biofouling is addressed through an interconnected, multi-layered biosecurity system spanning pre-border, border, and post-border components. Despite this comprehensive system, significant challenges remain in translating policy into effective practice. This presentation is based on a study that examines the implementation challenges associated with ship biofouling management across Australia’s biosecurity system to identify opportunities for improvement. A mixed-methods approach of key stakeholders’ surveys, semi-structured interviews, and desktop analysis of relevant policy and regulatory documents. The findings show that, while Australia has a robust and well-developed system, its implementation is constrained by financial, human and physical resources, gaps in organisational capability, work health and safety considerations, the absence of standardised mandatory measures, and increasing pressures from climate and environmental change. These challenges highlight the complexity of operationalising biosecurity across multiple system components. Addressing these barriers is critical not only for Australia but also for informing global efforts to manage ship biofouling. This paper reasons there is an urgent need for strengthened collaboration and capacity-building partnerships between scientists, policymakers, and stakeholders, alongside regular review of international instruments to ensure responsiveness to evolving environmental conditions.

  1. Arndt E, Schneider K, Bland L, Robinson A, Gibert A, Camac J and Kompas T (2024) 'A conceptual framework for measuring and improving the resilience of biosecurity systems’, Journal of Applied Ecology, 61(8):1749-60, doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14707.
  2. Awad A, Haag F, Anil AC, A A, GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships Programme I, CSIR-NIO and IUCN. (2014) Guidance on Port Biological Baseline Surveys. GloBallast Monograph No. 22.
  3. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), (2024) Australian biofouling requirements. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/aircraft-vessels-military/vessels/marine-pest-biosecurity/biofouling/australian-biofouling-requirements
  4. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, (2024) Environmental biosecurity and our biosecurity system. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/policy/environmental/our-biosecurity-system
  5. GEF-UNDP-IMO GloFouling Partnerships (2019) Non-indigenous species and Invasive Aquatic Species., accessed 05.11.2024. https://www.glofouling.imo.org/the-issue
  6. Sardain A, Sardain E and Leung B (2019) 'Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050’, Nature Sustainability, 2(4):274-82, doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0245-y.